Showing posts with label IPO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IPO. Show all posts
Tuesday, 26 September 2017
Thought for Food: IP and Takeaway and Restaurant Innovation
Jane Lambert
What possible link could there be between IP and fast food? Lots when you think of it. Trade Marks, passing off, geographical indications and of course all sorts of improvements in food preparation and distribution technology that can be patented.
That will explain why Gary Townley of the Intellectual Property Office will be speaking and exhibiting at the Takeaway & Restaurant Innovation Expo 2017 that takes place at the ExCel Centre today and tomorrow. Gary is also presenting a course on IP for the food and drink industry at Northampton Central Library on Thursday.
IP in the production, preparation, marketing and distribution is a subject of which I have had a lot of experience having been in some important cases and having advised and represented some rising stars in the industry. If you are engaged in agriculture, food preparation, distribution or catering I should be glad to talk to you. Call +44 (0)20 7404 5252 during office hours or send me me a message through my contact form.
Wednesday, 23 March 2016
You wouldn't use a wood to get out of a bunker: seeking and using IP advice
![]() |
| A Set of Clubs
Author Post406
Source Wikipedia
Creative Commons Licence
|
Jane Lambert
On 23 Feb 2016 the Intellectual Property Office ("IPO") updated its guidance Seeking intellectual property advice. In its passage on Invention Promotion Companies it warns:
"Some unreliable firms promise to evaluate your invention for a fee of a few hundred pounds. They then tell you that your invention has great market potential. They may offer to promote your invention to manufacturers if you pay a fee of several thousand pounds up front. Once you have paid up, they may do little or nothing for you."
"If an invention promotion firm approaches you", it urges, "take great care." Very good advice which us repeated frequently by patent offices, consumer protection organizations, inventors' clubs and IP professionals the world over.
Yet despite those warnings more and more people fall for the promises of such companies and find themselves seriously out of pocket as a result. "Why is that?" one might ask. Part of the answer is that innovation companies offer a simple solution to the question how do I get my new product or business to market without anyone else nicking my idea.
Unfortunately, protecting a new idea long enough for it to make a reasonable return for its creators is not usually a straightforward matter because the law favours competition and freedom to carry on business. The world's very first intellectual property legislation, The Statute of Monopolies 1623, was in fact a statute to abolish monopolies and restraints of trade. Parliament recognized, however, that it is expensive and risky to develop new products and processes and that businesses need some respite from unbridled competition as an incentive to invest in new inventions.
For that reason there is no one stop intellectual property shop. You need all the professionals mentioned in the IPO's guidance to get the right legal protection for your business idea.
You need a patent attorney to apply on your behalf for a British or European patent for your invention in the United Kingdom and he or she should also be able to help you get one for other countries. If you have a trade name or logo that needs protecting a trade mark attorney can make an application to the IPO or European Intellectual Property Office for British or European Union trade mark. Patent and trade mark attorneys should also be able to help you get registered and registered Community designs from the IPO or EUIPO.
If you need a licence from a third party to make a product, use a process or carry on business under a franchise a specialist solicitor or barrister can help you negotiate one. Such a solicitor or barrister can also draw up terms upon which others can use your invention, design or other intellectual asset. If you believe that your intellectual property right has been infringed or if you are accused of infringing someone else's rights he or she should help you resolve your dispute satisfactorily.
Each of those professionals has his or her own special skills and training for a particular job. In that way thet are rather like the woods and irons in your golf bag. There was a time when you had to instruct a solicitor or patent or trade mark attorney in order to consult a barrister but you can now instruct many of them directly under the Public Access scheme.
Instructing a public access barrister is often a good way of finding other professionals that you may need such as patent or trade mark attorneys, solicitors or foreign lawyers. Through our work we get to know a lot of those professionals and what they can do. Although there is now plenty of overlap between our work and the work of other professionals we have a professional duty to refer a client to a solicitor. patent or trade mark attorney or other intermediary if that is in the client's best interests. As our core work is advice on difficult points of law, drafting complex legal instruments and oral and written advocacy we tend to refer patent and trade mark prosecution to patent and trade mark attorneys and litigation to solicitors. Our relationship with those other professionals is in that regard rather like the relationship that subsists between a consultant surgeon or physician and general medical practitioner.
I am often asked whether there is a duplication of effort or additional expense in instructing different professionals. Sometimes that happens where for example a litigator attempts to do work that is better left to an advocate but it should not. Indeed, it should actually save time and costs.
If you want to discuss this article or IP advice in general call me on 020 7404 5252 during office hours or send me a message through my contact form.
Wednesday, 16 July 2014
London is Number 1 in the UK for Branding and Design
| Piccadilly Circus at Night
Source Wikipedia
|
Jane Lambert
London was also top in the number of registered design applications (1,153 compared to the South East's 1.066) but second to the South East in the number of registrations (720 in 2013 compared to the South East's 883).
London came second to the South East in the number of UK patent applications (2,588 in 2013 compared to 2.522 the previous year thereby bucking the national trend) and grants (346 in 2013). The comparable figures for South East England were 2,822 applications and 346 grants.
We can assist London artists, designers, inventors, entrepreneurs and investors with our IP clinics at Middlesex University and our talks and publications all of which are free of charge. For our chargeable services see "IP Services from Barristers" 6 Apr 2013 4-5 IP. If anyone wants to discuss his article or any patent, trade mark, design or other intellectual property matter he or she should call us on 020 7404 5252 or get in touch through my contact form. You can also tweet me, write on my wall or send me a message through G+, Linkedin or Xing.
Thursday, 10 October 2013
Introduction to Design Law
| British Leyland v Armstrong Patents - the appeal over exhaust pipes that changed British design law Photo Wilipedia |
Jane Lambert
In everyday language the word design is used in two senses. We talk of designer jeans and furnishings but also of engine and web design. When used in the first sense the word refers to the appearance of things. In the second sense the word refers to the shape or configuration of an article often so that the article can perform a function. We call designs in the first category decorative, ornamental or even aesthetic designs and those in the second category functional designs. Most legal systems including ours protect decorative and functional designs in different ways.
That has not always been the case. Until the 31 July 1989 most functional as well as decorative designs were protected by copyright in the United Kingdom and many Commonwealth countries. Theoretically s.3 of the Copyright Act 1956 did not protect designs as such, but the engineering or production drawing from which an object (which could be a machine or a component for a machine) was manufactured. So long as they were not copied wholly from an antecedent work, such drawings qualified for copyright protection as original artistic works. Copyright subsisted in those drawings for a very long time, namely the life of the author plus 50 years. If the object that had been made to the drawing had been copied then so too had the drawing, albeit indirectly, The sanctions for copyright infringement were draconian. In addition to injunctions. orders for delivery up and compensatory and additional damages each infringing copy was deemed to belong to the copyright owner and an infringer who had sold such such copies also had to pay damages for conversion.
The difficulties of protecting functional designs by artistic copyright were exposed by the decision of the House of Lords in British Leyland Motor Corporation and Others v Armstrong Patents Company Ltd and Others [1986] 2 WLR 400, [1986] UKHL 7, [1986] RPC 279, (1986) 5 Tr LR 97, [1986] FSR 221, [1986] 1 All ER 850, [1986] ECC 534, [1986] AC 577 where a motor manufacturer relied on copyright to prevent a replacement parts manufacturer from making exhaust pipes for its motor cars. In order to prevent monopolization of the after-market the law lords developed a non-statutory exemption to the Copyright Act 1956 conferring a right to repair.
Shortly after that appeal Parliament passed the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 which came into effect on 1 Aug 1989. S.51 (1) of that Act provided:
"It is not an infringement of any copyright in a design document or model recording or embodying a design for anything other than an artistic work or a typeface to make an article to the design or to copy an article made to the design."At a stroke that provision brought to an end copyright protection of functional designs. However, Part III of the same Act introduced a new intellectual property right known as design right which subsisted in original designs. "Design" for these purposes was defined by s.213 (1) of the 1988 Act as:
"the design of any aspect of the shape or configuration (whether internal or external) of the whole or part of an article."This right could be infringed by making articles to the design and making articles to the design was defined by s.226 (2) as
"copying the design so as to produce articles exactly or substantially to that design, and references in this Part to making articles to a design shall be construed accordingly."Although design right is very similar to copyright there are a number of important differences. First, the term is very much shorter:
- up to 10 years from the date upon which articles made to the design are first offered for sale or hire; or
- up to 15 years from the date the design was first recorded in a design document or prototype if articles made to the designer are not offered for sale or hire in the first 5 years of that period.
Secondly, in the last 5 years of the term anyone in the world including an infringer can apply for a licence to do any act that would otherwise infringe design right as of right. Thirdly, as very few countries adopted similar legislation the citizens of very few countries outside the EU are entitled to claim design right protection for their functional designs.
S.213 (3) (c) of the Act excludes "surface decoration" from the definition of "design" for the purposes of Part III. Thus, the only way of protecting fabrics, wall coverings and the like remains copyright.
Although decorative designs were protected by copyright until 1989 it was also possible to register them with the Intellectual Property Office ("IPO") for up to 5 renewable periods of 5 years each under the Registered Designs Act 1949. As originally enacted, registration conferred a monopoly known as "design copyright" for new or original designs and design for that purpose meant "features of shape, configuration, pattern or ornament applied to an article by any industrial process or means, being features which in the finished article appeal to and are judged solely by the eye." The 1949 Act is still in force but it has been overhauled twice: first by Part IV of, and Sched. 4 to, the Copyright, Designs Act 1988 and, more recently, by the Registered Designs Regulations 2001 which implement Directive 98/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 on the legal protection of designs. The IPO has published a useful unofficial consolidation of the Registered Designs Act 1949 as amended. Under the amended Act designs may be registered if they are new and have individual character.
Designs that are new and have individual character may also be registered at OHIM (Office of Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) for the EU (including the UK) under the Community Designs Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs (OJ EC No L 3 of 5.1.2002, p. 1). Designs registered with OHIM under this Regulation are known as registered Community designs.
The Community Designs Regulation also establishes a new intellectual property right for the whole EU known as unregistered Community design. Designs that are new and have individual character and could therefore be registered with OHIM as registered Community designs or indeed with the IPO under the Registered Designs Act 1949 are protected from copying for up to 3 years from the time they are first made available within the EU. This unregistered right is particularly useful for the fashion, toy and other industries where the shelf life of a design is very short.
To recap there are five ways of protecting designs in the UK:
- functional and indeed some ornamental designs are protected in the UK alone by design right pursuant to Part III of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988;
- artwork recording designs of fabrics, wall coverings and other surface decoration continues to be protected by copyright;
- designs that are new and have individual character can be protected in the UK by registration under the Registered Designs Act 1949;
- such designs could also be protected throughout the whole EU by registration as registered Community designs; and
- such designs can also be protected for up to 3 years throughout the EU without registration as unregistered Community designs.
Design law is likely to be overhauled yet again by the Intellectual Property Bill which is now with the House of Commons. For an overview and commentary on the Bill as it stood in May see my article on The Intellectual Property Bill 28 May 2013 NIPC Law.
Should you wish to learn more about design law, I shall be leading a seminar on Creative Output - Copyright and Related Rights on 30 Oct 2013 at 4-5 Gray's Inn Square between 14:00 and 16:00. If you want to come you can register on-line through our Eventrbrite site. The event is free but places are filling up so it is essential to book. If you want to discuss this article or any aspect of design law call me on 020 7404 5252 during office hours or get in touch through my contact form.
Related Articles
Jane Lambert "What is IP? Why do Folk want it? How do they get it? How to learn more?" 20 Aug 2013 IP South East
Related Articles
Jane Lambert "What is IP? Why do Folk want it? How do they get it? How to learn more?" 20 Aug 2013 IP South East
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

